This is part three of my discussion of Everything I Want to Do Is Illegal.
Read part one here and part two here.
When I started reading this book I knew it would make me angry. I was not prepared for how angry it would make me. You may want to take a few kickboxing classes after reading this one. If I get a bit more colorful in this segment you know why…
In chapter 8 Salatin discusses organic certification and how the word has become illegal for him to use. Salatin actually stood in opposition to organic certification because he felt government regulating organic food would be a bad thing and his opinion was not a popular one.
His logic is amazingly clear though and by allowing government to regulate organics we have shot ourselves in the foot. Now the small, ethical, organic farmer has to compete with industrial organic and run the risk of getting smooshed when we all know that industrial organic goes against everything that the word “organic” used to stand for.
I can see it in my mind all the smallish organic farmers thinking they could get some assistance from the government and be able to stick it to large industrial operations that were trying to cash in on the organic fad or squash it so it wouldn’t be a problem for them. Farmers lobbied for organic certification and got it, all the while allowing government to come in and serve as nanny over their operation. “Ha, ha…look at us. We are organic and you aren’t. Now everyone will know our food is better.”
Of course the nanny turned on them and is now changing the rules to allow for industrialized organic and weakened standards. If the consumer had been trusted to make their own decision and choose organic without a fancy certification how much better could it have been? How could big agricorp have fought that battle? Not very easily… but silly little farmers decided to give them leverage. Now big agricorp is saying something like this to the organic farmers, “See that, I am organic now too and everyone will foolishly think my food is just as good as yours…how do you like that biotch?!” Salatin articulates it much better in the book though.
This chapter also discusses why Salatin feels strictly organic is not always better for people or planet.
In chapter 9 we learn about best management practices and specifically how that relates to handling manure. Salatin also shares with us some of his political ideals…such as the fact that he thinks all drugs (yes even crack cocaine and heroine) should be legal. He doesn’t feel that the government should be able to tell us what we can and cannot do with our own bodies. Some of his views were a bit shocking to me but they make sense. It should be no surprise that the government nannies are setting their sights on something we personally care about…we allowed them to get a foot in the door.
Chapter 10 addresses some of the ways that environmentalists have actually harmed the movement towards more sustainable agriculture by not looking at the food system as a whole.
Chapter 11 discusses the fear that people have learned to have toward any food that is not inspected and certified and the government LOVES it. If you don’t see USDA inspected on your food you should rightly expect that it could kill you.
Interestingly Salatin has supplied food to many chefs over the years that completely trust that the food he turns out is better tasting, healthier, and safer than anything that can be bought with a USDA seal of approval. Most gourmet chefs will step outside the USDA safe zone as much as they can. They are willing to stake their livelihood and reputation on it by serving these foods to their customers. That says a lot to me and it should say a lot to everyone.
Salatin points out that the whole system, family farm or government processing facility, depends on personal integrity. And integrity cannot be “policed, legislated, or inspected.”
Any one worker at a food processing plant can taint the food or contaminate it in some way and they are protected by their money and their army of lawyers. A small local farmer does not have that protection or that safety net, so who really has more incentive to turn out a safe product? It makes you think.
At the end of the chapter Salatin talks about how he would like to see local foods get a fair shake for a just a year’s time and see how things turn around. The fact that they can still serve their communities with two hands cuffed behind their back bespeaks the power they already have….the government won’t chance letting that beast get away from them. That is why the consumers need to fight.
Chapter 13 may not be the favorite among environmentalists as it once again talks about how myopic their thinking can be at times. Salatin refers to himself as an environmentalist at times but he sees that there is a big problem today with rabid environmentalists who give no leeway for any viewpoint but their own and who fail to see the whole picture or even include humans in their dream of a perfect world.
Two areas he sees as problems are those of forestry and logging and disposing of predators. Salatin feels that a healthier eco system includes cutting down some trees and that strict no cut zones have actually done more harm than good. It was a rather interesting read. I had never thought about it before but I have to admit that I am not against cutting trees if done in a reasonable and responsible manner. It can be done ethically and with minimal impact so strict no cut policies do not make sense in my mind.
Salatin also points out that wild animals and predators will always be a part of farming and that strict no kill policies harm farmers and what they are trying to accomplish. Wild animals are considered to be the property of the state and therefore not to be harmed. Some species might also be protected. But what is a farmer to do when their livelihood is being attacked by wild predators? They will do what they have to do and I have no issue with that either…but many environmentalists do. I am not against controlled hunting either.
Salatin mentions how he has had to deal with foxes, hawks, bears, and a few other species. Protecting his property and livelihood make some of his actions illegal and that is a shame. In this chapter he recounts how he called the state once and asked them too kindly come out and control their property. It was a hilarious read.
It brought to mind some of my experiences living in
Oh boy… is this a book that doesn’t end?! Stay tuned for part 4.
[tags]Everything I Want to Do Is Illegal, book, review, Joel Salatin[/tags]
Welcome back! Remember to subscribe to my RSS feed. You can also subscribe via RSS reader or email (right). Thanks for visiting!
![[del.icio.us]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[Kaboodle]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/kaboodle.png)
![[MySpace]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Reddit]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[Squidoo]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/squidoo.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Email]](http://www.naturemoms.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)








[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
“Most gourmet chefs will step outside the USDA safe zone as much as they can.”
True! A local Houston newspaper (the Houston Press) ran an article about chefs hunting their own deer for venison a couple of years ago. Here it is:
http://www.houstonpress.com/2003-11-06/news/shooting-bambi-s-mom/full
It’s ironic that, in a landscape that has been greatly modified by human habitation, the most humane and ecologically sensible thing to do is to shoot the deer and eat them.
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
I can see the USDA label being used as bad thing, but for many companies it has been a good thing so their customers know their products are really organic. For small farmers there are other organic certifications they can get, from small local, non-government groups, but some labeling is better then no labeling, rather then organic and non-organic produce can both be sold under the organic labeling with no regulation. I also see how animals on the farm land could be a problem, but I would hope and organic farmer would look for better solutions then to kill rare species who are just making a come back. This has been a big issue with free range cattle farmers as wolf populations are growing. However farmers also have to remember that while the wolves may be killing their cattle, they are also killing other wild animals which may at some point threaten their crops. There are many ways to deal with this issue, rather then shooting the animals.
A farmer should always try other options first. But if a wolf will attack a cow…what would stop them from attacking a child? There just aren’t any simple answers, but if the government wants to make hard and fast rules they best be coming up with some hard and fast solutions IMO.
I’m not sure the existence of a government label for organic would really make a difference — the fact is, if it was advantageous to do so, companies would have put the organic label on products without government approval and without sticking to organic principles. Then consumers would have no way to know what was organic.
I can see both sides of the debate but for me it is kind of mute because with so much garbage organic being certified now I still have to research all my food sources and companies and consumers could have done that in the first place if they really cared about organic. Certified organic is still helpful but it loses more and more meaning every year as unethical companies mange to get certified and the standards get weakened. Most consumers will not be hip to that though.
Education of the consumer is where we need to concentrate.
BTW…thanks for your comments Rick!
Great post – picked it up from carnival. Recently I’ve heard a lot of people complaining about libertarians and how their “free market” policies would lead to corporate take over. On the contrary we see that corporate take over has already occurred – weaving their power into the fabric of government regulation…………this done to eliminate competition from the “little guy.” This is the exact opposite of what the law should be accomplishing. Laws in this country continue to make it more and more difficult for lower income and uneducated people to ever have a chance at starting their own business and thus pull themselves out of poverty. Oh well enough babbling for today. Thanks for the info you posted – will pass it along to my friends and family.
barry b.’s last blog post..Ron Paul with Tim Russert – You can?t box Dr. Paul in!